By Michael A. Cremo, Richard L. Thompson
Read Online or Download Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race PDF
Similar Archaeology books
Set within the middle of the yank jungle and that includes Declan Carberry, the not-so good-looking hero of Day of Wrath, this page-turner oozes pleasure, exotica and formulation One suspense. Archaeologist Leo is on a dig. yet this can be no traditional task. he is deep within the center of the Mexican jungle uncovering one other centuries-old Mayan urban.
The Viking popularity is one in every of bloodthirsty seafaring warriors, many times plundering the British Isles and the North Atlantic in the course of the early center a long time. but Vikings have been additionally investors, settlers, and farmers, with a posh inventive and linguistic tradition, whose enlargement in a foreign country led them to move the Atlantic for the 1st time in ecu historical past.
Everybody has heard of of the lifeless Sea Scrolls, yet amidst the conspiracies, the politics, and the sensational claims, it may be tough to split fantasy from fact. right here, Timothy Lim explores the cultural and old heritage of the scrolls, and examines their value for our realizing of the outdated testomony and the origins of Christianity and Judaism.
The traditional Egyptians are a permanent resource of fascination--mummies and pyramids, curses and rituals have captured our imaginations for generations. all of us have a psychological photo of historical Egypt, yet is it definitely the right one? How a lot can we quite find out about this as soon as nice civilization? during this soaking up creation, Ian Shaw, one of many finest experts on old Egypt, describes how our present principles approximately Egypt are dependent not just at the exciting discoveries made via early Egyptologists but in addition on interesting new varieties of proof produced by way of sleek clinical and linguistic analyses.
Additional resources for Forbidden Archeology: The Hidden History of the Human Race
Empiricism therefore turns into inextricably entangled with speculative modes of notion and deeply held emotional biases and prejudices. regularly, the idea and bias are conscientiously masked with a skinny veneer of truth. yet as imperfect as this method will be, it's, for scientists, the one person who will be utilized; consequently, you may no less than insist on constant software of ideas and shut reasoning from the saw evidence. This granted, the case made through Prestwich and Harrison held up particularly good opposed to the arguments thrown via their competitors, who easily appeared to be trying to find how you can reject anything they have been a priori no longer ready to simply accept. an attractive instance of this can be present in G. Worthington Smith’s persevered competition to Harrison’s eoliths. On March 22, 1899, Benjamin Harrison wrote in a letter to Sir Edward R. Harrison (1928, p. 224): “After I turned conversant in Mr. Worthington Smith in 1878, he at times despatched me fascinating trifles, which have been duly marked and put in a drawer. In facing this lot the day past, I came across a few fascinating impolite specimens from Basuto Land. those are approximately as impolite as should be, and are facsimiles of these now present in Bushmen’s caves in vital Africa. They function [resemble] my impolite implements. unusual that Smith periods all my Plateau unearths [eoliths] as cretins, make-beliefs, casuals, travesties—anything yet human made. And but, as some time past as 1880, he despatched me these then-acknowledged stones, as though to inspire me to seem for comparable specimens. while i locate them, he scouts [rejects] them! ” right here we have now an obvious example of inconsistent software of rules at the a part of Smith. Harrison wrote to Smith approximately this, who spoke back, in a a bit funny tone, on March 23, 1899, that even though he vaguely recalled possibly having despatched a few flakes and stones, he did not see what bearing that they had at the current query: “I don’t relatively see what . . . smooth flakes need to do with high-level implements. ” Smith then said that he himself had stumbled on stones comparable to eoliths yet by no means took them domestic. He then concluded his letter to Harrison with extra humor: “Now i am hoping you're fairly good and blessed with a cheerful and peaceable brain, with out pre-glacial nightmares . . . and palaeolithic tailless apes” (E. Harrison 1928, pp. 224–225). The now not so sophisticated ridicule of the very suggestion of Homo sapiens latest within the Tertiary is standard of the unscientific equipment utilized by scientists to brush aside proof that falls outdoors their specific circle of comprehension. Smith’s admission that he himself had intentionally kept away from amassing specimens of eoliths can be slightly destructive to the proposal of evenhanded medical therapy of arguable questions. It usually occurs that anomalous proof is neglected. Smith’s assertion that he didn't see any connection among sleek flakes and old ones is usually relatively curious, for such comparative stories of lithic applied sciences have been, and almost immediately are, famous as a suitable technique for comparing intentional human paintings on stone gadgets.